In
John Bunyan’s poem “Of Man by Nature”, John Bunyan emphasizes what he believes
to be the nature of man through his use of syntax and informal language so the
meaning of the poem is easier for less educated people to understand the
topic’s importance.
Bunyan, concerned essentially with
the “inward” man rather than the “outward one”, wrote the poem “Of Man by
Nature” reflecting on what the poem’s title implies: what man’s inherent nature
is. The syntax he uses points out the
most important points he raises in his poem, the most important characteristics
of man’s internal nature. By using the
capitalization of specific words throughout the poem, he places specific
emphasis on what he believes to be man’s foundational nature. He says, “Of Ways, he loves the
wider;\ With Wickedness a Sider,\ More Venom than a Spider”
(Bunyan 2-4). By capitalizing words such
as “ways”, “wickedness”, “sider”, “venom”, and “spider”, Bunyan makes it clear
to all who read the poem that these are characteristics that describe man apart
from the good of God, man who is inherently evil. Even the most uneducated person who reads
this poem can innately know that the capitalized words are what are most
important within the poem.
Furthermore, the language John
Bunyan uses in “Of Man by Nature” is not formal language that may be difficult
for all to understand but informal and colloquial language. The deliberate use of contractions in the
first lines of each quatrain is an example of Bunyan’s use of colloquial
language. In these lines he writes,
“From God he’s a Back slider” (Bunyan 1) and, “In Sin he’s a Confider” (Bunyan
5). The contraction “he’s” as opposed to
the more formal writing “he is” demonstrates Bunyan’s use of colloquial and
informal language. Bunyan also uses
informal language in his word choices throughout the poem. Where formal language could be used to
describe something as important as man’s foundational nature, Bunyan uses words
such as “guider” (Bunyan 7), “spider” (Bunyan 4), and “a sider” (Bunyan 3) to
describe man’s inherent nature. The more
formal rendering of “guider” and “a sider” would be “guide” and “sides” but by
using these words to fulfill a rhyme scheme in which every line rhymes, Bunyan
must resort to informal language.
Bunyan, though, does understand that something as important as man’s
inherent sinfulness apart from God should be something every person understands,
whether educated or uneducated, so by using colloquial language by means of
contractions which are used daily in conversation and by means of his word
choices, Bunyan gives his poem an easy rhythm and feel that common men can
understand.
Similarly
to the depiction of how man is inherently sinful apart from God in “Of Man by
Nature”, C.S. Lewis’ collection of fictional letters in The Screwtape Letters also depicts how apart from God, man will be
in the presence of and manipulated by devils, exhibited by the very fact that
the letters are written by a demon, Screwtape, to his nephew demon,
Wormwood. The novel shows how these
devils rely on man’s tendency to sin (“the daily and hourly temptation” (Lewis
69)) to keep him from converting to “The Enemy’s” religion. As Screwtape writes in his letter #1, man is
not like God or demons. He is not “a
pure spirit” (Lewis 2). If by nature “From
God [man’s] a Back slider,\ Of Ways, he loves the wider” (Bunyan 2-3) and “The
Devil is his Rider” (Bunyan 8), one of Lewis’s major purposes in The Screwtape Letters was to show just
this—to show that man is easily manipulated because he is not that “pure
spirit”. Lewis, however, takes this idea
one step further than Bunyan does in his poem.
While Bunyan never explicitly says that God man can be changed through a
relationship with God, Lewis in The
Screwtape Letters explicitly shows that in the end “The Enemy” (who is
Christ) can change man’s soul. As C.S.
Lewis concludes in the last letter Screwtape writes to Wormwood, “You have let
a soul slip through your fingers. The
howl of sharpened famine for that loss re-echoes at this moment through all the
levels of the Kingdom of Noise down to the very Throne itself. It makes me mad to think of it” (171).
If man is not a pure spirit, a god or a demon, then what could he be classified as?
ReplyDeleteI love the fact that C.S. Lewis uses colloquial language in order to create a piece that all types of people can understand. By doing this, he comments on the basis of man and the foundation that makes us human. However, do you believe that by using such informal language, it is possible for Lewis to miss the inner thoughts and emotions, the deeper aspects of the human psyche that essentially influence who we are? Can the informal language describe only a thin layer of what actually makes us human? Great presentation! :)
ReplyDeleteHowever, I do admire Lewis use of colloquial language because he is attempting to describe something that is within all of us. It only makes sense that if one wants to express a universal idea, they should use language that is universally understood. It emphasizes that simplicity is best and maybe that is a point he is trying to make about man. I believe that being human is about living and not trying to find all the answers. Therefore, trying to explain the intricate details of what makes us human would be to go against what is actually making us human, the fact that we don’t know. “To err is human” –Alexander Pope.
DeleteI don't necessarily think that Lewis's use of informal langauge detracts from his ability to capture deeper aspects of the human psyche. I think that his colloquial langauge allows for a better exploration human nature beacause it represents how the majority of people actually think and speak.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Amanda. C.S Lewis has the ability to explore human nature through his language and from this ability he can help people relate to what happens within his writing. However, responding to Madison's last question, I think his use of informal language is only able to describe one layer of us as humans. With more diverse language styles one is able to explore all of the layers humans are composed of.
ReplyDeleteThe effectiveness of providing layers in one’s writing allows for more perspectives to relate to the piece. No matter where one is on the social ladder or where they came from, their background, they would be able to understand where the author is coming from, which is why I think a lot of writers write. It’s possible that their goal is to be able connect with the readers through their ideas and stories, and maybe build upon old ideas in the reader’s minds.
DeleteIn the beginning when Madison spoke of layers I instantly thought of Shrek. The quote I thought of was, people "are like onions, [people] have layers, onions have layers... they both have layers" (Shrek). This idea of layers is not a focused concept throughout C.S Lewis's writing. If he had wanted to exhibit the idea of layering throughout his writing then his style, would have been more varied from colloquial language to elevated diction.